2002 Audi A2 vs. 2004 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2004 Dodge Neon is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi A2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi A2 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Neon (132 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2002 Audi A2. (108 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 2002 Audi A2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Neon weights approximately 101 kg more than 2002 Audi A2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Neon (176 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Audi A2. (155 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Audi A2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Audi A2 | 2004 Dodge Neon | |
| Make | Audi | Dodge |
| Model | A2 | Neon |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 132 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 155 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.9 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1171 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.3 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 6.1 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.2 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 47 L |
