2002 Audi A2 vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi A2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi A2 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Cooper weights approximately 115 kg more than 2002 Audi A2.
Because 2013 Mini Cooper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Mini Cooper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi A2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 155 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi A2 | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Audi | Mini |
Model | A2 | Cooper |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.9 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 3723 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1407 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.3 L/100km | 5.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 6.1 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 50 L |