2002 Audi A3 vs. 1952 Hudson Hornet
To start off, 2002 Audi A3 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Hudson Hornet (144 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2002 Audi A3. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Hudson Hornet should accelerate faster than 2002 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 460 kg more than 2002 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Hudson Hornet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Hudson Hornet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Audi A3 | 1952 Hudson Hornet | |
| Make | Audi | Hudson |
| Model | A3 | Hornet |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1967 cc | 4810 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 144 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2990 mm |
