2002 Audi A3 vs. 1962 DAF 750
To start off, 2002 Audi A3 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 1,967 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi A3 (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi A3 weights approximately 678 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi A3 (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Audi A3 | 1962 DAF 750 | |
| Make | Audi | DAF |
| Model | A3 | 750 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1967 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 31 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 57 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 85.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.5 mm | 65 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 7.1:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 662 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2060 mm |
