2002 Audi A3 vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 2002 Audi A3 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,593 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi A3 (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66.
Because 1976 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi A3 (148 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi A3 | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Audi | Volvo |
Model | A3 | 66 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1593 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.4 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |