2002 Audi A3 vs. 1978 Nissan Cedric

To start off, 2002 Audi A3 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi A3 (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1978 Nissan Cedric. (74 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1978 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 75 kg more than 2002 Audi A3.

Because 1978 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi A3 (201 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Nissan Cedric. (147 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Nissan Cedric.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Audi A3 1978 Nissan Cedric
Make Audi Nissan
Model A3 Cedric
Year Released 2002 1978
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1984 cc 1982 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 148 HP 74 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 201 Nm 147 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 2800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Weight 1275 kg 1350 kg
Vehicle Length 4210 mm 4700 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2660 mm 2700 mm