2002 Audi A3 vs. 1986 Suzuki SJ 410

To start off, 2002 Audi A3 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Suzuki SJ 410. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Suzuki SJ 410 would be higher. At 1,967 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi A3 (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1986 Suzuki SJ 410. (44 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1986 Suzuki SJ 410. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi A3 weights approximately 470 kg more than 1986 Suzuki SJ 410. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1986 Suzuki SJ 410 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Audi A3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Suzuki SJ 410 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi A3 (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Suzuki SJ 410. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Suzuki SJ 410.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Audi A3 1986 Suzuki SJ 410
Make Audi Suzuki
Model A3 SJ 410
Year Released 2002 1986
Body Type Hatchback SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1967 cc 970 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 138 HP 44 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 320 Nm 74 Nm
Torque RPM 1750 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front 4WD
Vehicle Weight 1340 kg 870 kg
Vehicle Length 4210 mm 3450 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1470 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2040 mm