2002 Audi A3 vs. 1994 Opel Omega

To start off, 2002 Audi A3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi A3 (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1994 Opel Omega. (129 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1994 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Opel Omega weights approximately 250 kg more than 2002 Audi A3.

Because 1994 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Opel Omega (250 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Audi A3. (201 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1994 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Audi A3.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Audi A3 1994 Opel Omega
Make Audi Opel
Model A3 Omega
Year Released 2002 1994
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1984 cc 2498 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 148 HP 129 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4500 RPM
Torque 201 Nm 250 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 2200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Diesel
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1275 kg 1525 kg
Vehicle Length 4210 mm 4790 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2660 mm 2740 mm