2002 Audi A3 vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi A3 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Livina weights approximately 1130 kg more than 2002 Audi A3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi A3 (201 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Livina. (154 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2002 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Livina.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi A3 | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | A3 | Livina |
Year Released | 2002 | 2008 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 201 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 211 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 2405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |