2002 Audi A4 vs. 1984 Bitter SC
To start off, 2002 Audi A4 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Bitter SC would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Bitter SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Bitter SC (177 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2002 Audi A4. (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Bitter SC should accelerate faster than 2002 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Bitter SC weights approximately 10 kg more than 2002 Audi A4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1984 Bitter SC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Bitter SC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi A4 (310 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Bitter SC. (248 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2002 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Bitter SC.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi A4 | 1984 Bitter SC | |
Make | Audi | Bitter |
Model | A4 | SC |
Year Released | 2002 | 1984 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 2968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 248 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.3 mm | 95.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 69.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.5:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2690 mm |