2002 Audi A4 vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 2002 Audi A4 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2002 Audi A4. (148 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 2002 Audi A4.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi A4 | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
Make | Audi | Caterham |
Model | A4 | 1700 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1692 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Top Speed | 213 km/hour | 188 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 36 L |