2002 Audi A4 vs. 2010 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2010 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi A4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi A4 would be higher. At 4,394 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Land Rover LR3 (296 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2002 Audi A4. (184 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Audi A4.
Because 2010 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Audi A4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Land Rover LR3 (316 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Audi A4. (240 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 2010 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Audi A4 | 2010 Land Rover LR3 | |
| Make | Audi | Land Rover |
| Model | A4 | LR3 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 4394 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 184 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 316 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Top Speed | 223 km/hour | 199 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
