2002 Audi A4 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi A4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi A4 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Malibu (187 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2002 Audi A4. (168 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 2002 Audi A4.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi A4 (310 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Chevrolet Malibu. (244 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2002 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Chevrolet Malibu. 2013 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 2002 Audi A4 has manual transmission. 2002 Audi A4 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi A4 | 2013 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | A4 | Malibu |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2391 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 244 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.3 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 101 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1854 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1462 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2738 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.4 L/100km | 5.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.8 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |