2002 Audi A4 vs. 2013 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2013 Nissan Rogue is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi A4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi A4 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Rogue (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2002 Audi A4. (148 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 2002 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 160 kg more than 2002 Audi A4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Audi A4. (200 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2013 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Audi A4 | 2013 Nissan Rogue | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | A4 | Rogue |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 200 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4655 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 5.4 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 9.9 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |
