2002 Audi A6 vs. 1955 Buick 40
To start off, 2002 Audi A6 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi A6 (247 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1955 Buick 40. (234 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1955 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi A6 weights approximately 25 kg more than 1955 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Buick 40 (447 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Audi A6. (350 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1955 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi A6 | 1955 Buick 40 | |
Make | Audi | Buick |
Model | A6 | 40 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 5277 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 234 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 447 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1725 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3110 mm |