2002 Audi A6 vs. 1969 Mini MK III
To start off, 2002 Audi A6 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mini MK III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mini MK III would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi A6 (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1969 Mini MK III. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1969 Mini MK III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi A6 weights approximately 915 kg more than 1969 Mini MK III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi A6 (310 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mini MK III. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mini MK III.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi A6 | 1969 Mini MK III | |
Make | Audi | Mini |
Model | A6 | MK III |
Year Released | 2002 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 1274 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 645 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2040 mm |