2002 Audi A6 vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2002 Audi A6 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi A6 weights approximately 520 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2002 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi A6 | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
Model | A6 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2002 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2680 mm |