2002 Audi A6 vs. 1995 Xedos 6
To start off, 2002 Audi A6 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Xedos 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Xedos 6 would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi A6 (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1995 Xedos 6. (106 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1995 Xedos 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi A6 weights approximately 420 kg more than 1995 Xedos 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi A6 (310 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Xedos 6. (138 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2002 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Xedos 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Audi A6 | 1995 Xedos 6 | |
| Make | Audi | Xedos |
| Model | A6 | 6 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2496 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 138 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2620 mm |
