2002 Audi A6 vs. 2004 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2004 Ford Econoline is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi A6 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi A6 (296 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2004 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econoline weights approximately 465 kg more than 2002 Audi A6.
Because 2002 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi A6 (381 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2002 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi A6 | 2004 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | A6 | Econoline |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 381 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1860 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3510 mm |