2002 Audi A6 vs. 2007 Cadillac STS-V
To start off, 2007 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi A6 would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac STS-V (469 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 309 more horse power than 2002 Audi A6. (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 2002 Audi A6.
Because 2007 Cadillac STS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Cadillac STS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac STS-V (595 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 284 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Audi A6. (311 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi A6 | 2007 Cadillac STS-V | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | A6 | STS-V |
Year Released | 2002 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 4376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 469 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 311 Nm | 595 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.6 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.2 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 64 L |