2002 Audi A6 vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi A6 would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2002 Audi A6. (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2002 Audi A6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi A6 (311 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda CX-9. (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2002 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi A6 | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | A6 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 3727 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 311 Nm | 269 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.6 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.2 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 76 L |