2002 Audi A6 vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9

To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi A6 would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2002 Audi A6. (174 HP @ 3300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2002 Audi A6.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi A6 (370 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda CX-9. (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2002 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda CX-9. 2009 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 2002 Audi A6 has manual transmission. 2002 Audi A6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Audi A6 2009 Mazda CX-9
Make Audi Mazda
Model A6 CX-9
Year Released 2002 2009
Body Type Station Wagon SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2696 cc 3727 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 174 HP 268 HP
Engine RPM 3300 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 370 Nm 269 Nm
Torque RPM 1400 RPM 4250 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4940 mm 4600 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1940 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 2850 mm 2340 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 76 L