2002 Audi A6 vs. 2009 Subaru Tribeca

To start off, 2009 Subaru Tribeca is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi A6 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi A6 (296 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2009 Subaru Tribeca. (256 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2009 Subaru Tribeca.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi A6 (400 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Subaru Tribeca. (335 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2002 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Subaru Tribeca.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Audi A6 2009 Subaru Tribeca
Make Audi Subaru
Model A6 Tribeca
Year Released 2002 2009
Body Type Station Wagon SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4172 cc 3629 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V boxer
Valves per Cylinder 5 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 296 HP 256 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 335 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84.5 mm 99.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 93 mm 79 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 10.7:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 4870 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 2850 mm 2750 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 13.1 L/100km 13.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 64 L