2002 Audi A6 vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi A6 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi A6 (296 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2010 Jaguar XF. (271 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2010 Jaguar XF.
Because 2002 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Audi A6. (381 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi A6 | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | A6 | XF |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 271 HP |
Torque | 381 Nm | 600 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 70 L |