2002 Audi A6 vs. 2010 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2010 Nissan Titan is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi A6 would be higher. At 5,551 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Titan (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2002 Audi A6. (296 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 2002 Audi A6.
Because 2002 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Nissan Titan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Titan (522 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Audi A6. (381 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi A6 | 2010 Nissan Titan | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | A6 | Titan |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 5551 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 381 Nm | 522 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 5710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 4060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 140 L |