2002 Audi A6 vs. 2011 Ford F-250
To start off, 2011 Ford F-250 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi A6 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2002 Audi A6. (296 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2002 Audi A6.
Because 2002 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Ford F-250. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-250 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Audi A6. (381 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2011 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi A6 | 2011 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | A6 | F-250 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 381 Nm | 548 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1966 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3967 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 132 L |