2002 Audi A6 vs. 2011 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2011 Nissan Rogue is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Rogue (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2002 Audi A6. (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 2002 Audi A6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi A6 (311 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Rogue. (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2002 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Rogue.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi A6 | 2011 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | A6 | Rogue |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 311 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4681 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1659 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.6 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.2 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |