2002 Audi A6 vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER

To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi A6 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi A6 (296 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2013 Dodge CHARGER. (288 HP @ 6350 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2013 Dodge CHARGER. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 43 kg more than 2002 Audi A6.

With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi A6 (400 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Dodge CHARGER. (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2002 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Dodge CHARGER.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Audi A6 2013 Dodge CHARGER
Make Audi Dodge
Model A6 CHARGER
Year Released 2002 2013
Body Type Station Wagon Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4172 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 5 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 296 HP 288 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 6350 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 353 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84.5 mm 96 mm
Engine Stroke Size 93 mm 83 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Flex Fuel
Drive Type 4WD AWD
Transmission Type Automatic 8-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1840 kg 1883 kg
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 5077 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1905 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1482 mm
Wheelbase Size 2850 mm 3052 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 72 L