2002 Audi A6 vs. 2013 Ford E-Series
To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi A6 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford E-Series is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford E-Series (252 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2002 Audi A6. (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford E-Series should accelerate faster than 2002 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford E-Series weights approximately 1270 kg more than 2002 Audi A6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Ford E-Series is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford E-Series. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford E-Series (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Audi A6. (310 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2013 Ford E-Series will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Audi A6. 2013 Ford E-Series has automatic transmission and 2002 Audi A6 has manual transmission. 2002 Audi A6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Ford E-Series will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Audi A6 | 2013 Ford E-Series | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | A6 | E-Series |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2496 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 474 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.3 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 106 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 19.5:1 | 9.06:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 12 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 2830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5504 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 2111 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3505 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 5.4 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 9.7 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 181 L |
