2002 Audi A8 vs. 1954 Buick 40
To start off, 2002 Audi A8 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi A8 (191 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (141 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi A8 should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 165 kg more than 2002 Audi A8.
Because 1954 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi A8, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (309 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Audi A8. (280 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Audi A8.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi A8 | 1954 Buick 40 | |
Make | Audi | Buick |
Model | A8 | 40 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2771 cc | 4328 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 309 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1675 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 3110 mm |