2002 Audi A8 vs. 1966 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2002 Audi A8 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 2,771 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Audi A8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi A8 (191 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi A8 should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi A8 weights approximately 625 kg more than 1966 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi A8 (280 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Audi A8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi A8 | 1966 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Audi | Riley |
Model | A8 | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2002 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 2771 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2380 mm |