2002 Audi A8 vs. 1967 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2002 Audi A8 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Audi A8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi A8 (230 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi A8 should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi A8 weights approximately 1170 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Audi A8 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi A8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Audi A8 | 1967 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Audi | DAF |
| Model | A8 | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 745 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 33 L |
