2002 Audi A8 vs. 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2002 Audi A8 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,344 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi A8 (230 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (160 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi A8 should accelerate faster than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2002 Audi A8 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi A8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi A8 (450 Nm) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (251 Nm). This means 2002 Audi A8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi A8 | 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
Model | A8 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2002 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 3344 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 450 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2670 mm |