2002 Audi R8 vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2002 Audi R8 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi R8 (610 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 550 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 1083 kg more than 2002 Audi R8.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi R8 (698 Nm) has 583 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm). This means 2002 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Audi R8 | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | R8 | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 610 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 698 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 2 kg | 1085 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2540 mm |
