2002 Audi R8 vs. 1963 NSU 1000 LS

To start off, 2002 Audi R8 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 LS would be higher. At 3,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi R8 (610 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 568 more horse power than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. (42 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 NSU 1000 LS weights approximately 618 kg more than 2002 Audi R8.

Because 2002 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi R8 (698 Nm) has 628 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. (70 Nm). This means 2002 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. 2002 Audi R8 has automatic transmission and 1963 NSU 1000 LS has manual transmission. 1963 NSU 1000 LS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Audi R8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Audi R8 1963 NSU 1000 LS
Make Audi NSU
Model R8 1000 LS
Year Released 2002 1963
Engine Position Middle Rear
Engine Size 3600 cc 996 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 610 HP 42 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 698 Nm 70 Nm
Drive Type AWD Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 1 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 2 kg 620 kg
Vehicle Length 4660 mm 3790 mm
Vehicle Width 2010 mm 1490 mm
Vehicle Height 1090 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2260 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 66 L 34 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]