2002 Audi R8 vs. 1964 Austin A 40
To start off, 2002 Audi R8 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi R8 (610 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 563 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 40. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin A 40 weights approximately 758 kg more than 2002 Audi R8.
Because 2002 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi R8 (698 Nm) has 616 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin A 40. (82 Nm). This means 2002 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Audi R8 | 1964 Austin A 40 | |
| Make | Audi | Austin |
| Model | R8 | A 40 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 610 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 698 Nm | 82 Nm |
| Drive Type | AWD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1520 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2220 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 29 L |
