2002 Audi R8 vs. 1964 Steyr Haflinger
To start off, 2002 Audi R8 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Steyr Haflinger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Steyr Haflinger would be higher. At 3,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi R8 (610 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 586 more horse power than 1964 Steyr Haflinger. (24 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1964 Steyr Haflinger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Steyr Haflinger weights approximately 598 kg more than 2002 Audi R8.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi R8 (698 Nm) has 657 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Steyr Haflinger. (41 Nm). This means 2002 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Steyr Haflinger. 2002 Audi R8 has automatic transmission and 1964 Steyr Haflinger has manual transmission. 1964 Steyr Haflinger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Audi R8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Audi R8 | 1964 Steyr Haflinger | |
| Make | Audi | Steyr |
| Model | R8 | Haflinger |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 643 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 610 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 698 Nm | 41 Nm |
| Drive Type | AWD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 2840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1360 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 1510 mm |
