2002 Audi R8 vs. 1966 Holden HD
To start off, 2002 Audi R8 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 3,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi R8 (610 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 488 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden HD weights approximately 1198 kg more than 2002 Audi R8.
Because 2002 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Holden HD. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi R8 (698 Nm) has 461 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden HD. (237 Nm). This means 2002 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden HD.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Audi R8 | 1966 Holden HD | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | R8 | HD |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 2930 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 610 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 698 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Drive Type | AWD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |
