2002 Audi R8 vs. 1974 Holden Torana
To start off, 2002 Audi R8 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Holden Torana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Holden Torana would be higher. At 5,044 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Holden Torana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi R8 (610 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 371 more horse power than 1974 Holden Torana. (239 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1974 Holden Torana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Holden Torana weights approximately 1208 kg more than 2002 Audi R8.
Because 2002 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Holden Torana. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi R8 (698 Nm) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Holden Torana. (427 Nm). This means 2002 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Holden Torana.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Audi R8 | 1974 Holden Torana | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | R8 | Torana |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 5044 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 610 HP | 239 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 698 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Drive Type | AWD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2590 mm |
