2002 Audi R8 vs. 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 2002 Audi R8 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 3,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi R8 (610 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 525 more horse power than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste. (85 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste weights approximately 928 kg more than 2002 Audi R8.
Because 2002 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi R8 (698 Nm) has 567 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste. (131 Nm). This means 2002 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi R8 | 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | R8 | Celeste |
Year Released | 2002 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 610 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 698 Nm | 131 Nm |
Drive Type | AWD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2350 mm |