2002 Audi R8 vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi R8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi R8 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi R8 (610 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 433 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 2002 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi R8 (698 Nm) has 514 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm). This means 2002 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Audi R8 | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | R8 | E-350 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Van |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 610 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 698 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Drive Type | AWD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4437 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2619 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 57 L |
