2002 Audi R8 vs. 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE
To start off, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi R8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi R8 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi R8 (610 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 275 more horse power than 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE. (335 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE weights approximately 1878 kg more than 2002 Audi R8.
Both vehicles are all wheel drive (AWD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi R8 (698 Nm) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE. (450 Nm). This means 2002 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi R8 | 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | R8 | F-TYPE |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 610 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 698 Nm | 450 Nm |
Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2909 mm |