2002 Audi RS4 vs. 1969 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2002 Audi RS4 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi RS4 (376 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 295 more horse power than 1969 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi RS4 should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi RS4 weights approximately 275 kg more than 1969 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Audi RS4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi RS4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi RS4 | 1969 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | RS4 | Fairlane |
Year Released | 2002 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 2781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 376 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 40 L |