2002 Audi RS4 vs. 1978 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 2002 Audi RS4 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 365 kg more than 2002 Audi RS4.
Because 2002 Audi RS4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi RS4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Audi RS4 | 1978 Cadillac Brougham | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | RS4 | Brougham |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1978 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2671 cc | 5032 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 376 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3090 mm |
