2002 Audi RS6 vs. 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2002 Audi RS6 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 196 kg more than 2002 Audi RS6.
Because 2002 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Audi RS6 | 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Audi | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | RS6 | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4161 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 193 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 2106 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.6 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 109 L |
