2002 Audi RS6 vs. 1967 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2002 Audi RS6 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,161 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 355 more horse power than 1967 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 1967 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi RS6 weights approximately 740 kg more than 1967 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi RS6 (560 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 402 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi RS6 | 1967 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Audi | Triumph |
Model | RS6 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 64 L |