2002 Audi RS6 vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 2002 Audi RS6 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 321 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (123 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Because 2002 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Volvo 140. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi RS6 (560 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 390 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (170 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi RS6 | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Audi | Volvo |
Model | RS6 | 140 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 560 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |