2002 Audi RS6 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Triax
To start off, 2002 Audi RS6 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 4,161 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi RS6 weights approximately 312 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Triax.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Triax has automatic transmission and 2002 Audi RS6 has manual transmission. 2002 Audi RS6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Triax will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Audi RS6 | 2000 Chevrolet Triax | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | RS6 | Triax |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4161 cc | 660 cc |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1598 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2790 mm |
