2002 Audi RS6 vs. 2000 Chrysler Neon
To start off, 2002 Audi RS6 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Neon would be higher. At 4,161 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi RS6 (444 HP) has 294 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Neon. (150 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Neon.
Because 2002 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler Neon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chrysler Neon has automatic transmission and 2002 Audi RS6 has manual transmission. 2002 Audi RS6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chrysler Neon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi RS6 | 2000 Chrysler Neon | |
Make | Audi | Chrysler |
Model | RS6 | Neon |
Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 150 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.4 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 21.8 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.6 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 45 L |