2002 Audi RS6 vs. 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Audi RS6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Audi RS6 would be higher. At 4,161 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Audi RS6 (444 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 251 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. (193 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi RS6 weights approximately 966 kg more than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Audi RS6 (560 Nm) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser. (280 Nm). This means 2002 Audi RS6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Audi RS6 | 2003 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
| Make | Audi | Toyota |
| Model | RS6 | Land Cruiser |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4161 cc | 2982 cc |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 193 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 560 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 944 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 87 L |
